International mediators issued urgent warnings that American intervention with Israeli leadership represents the only viable path to salvaging the Gaza peace agreement. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan specifically called for US engagement with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, suggesting that without such intervention, plan failure becomes increasingly probable.
The appeal for American involvement reflects recognition that the United States maintains unique influence over Israeli decision-making. As a primary backer of the peace plan alongside the UN, US commitment to enforcement carries particular weight. Mediators argue that expressions of support prove insufficient without concrete pressure ensuring Israeli compliance with agreed terms.
Fidan’s warning comes amid mounting evidence of Israeli ceasefire violations, particularly incidents involving force against Palestinians near the yellow line boundary. He characterized violation levels as indescribable, with all indicators suggesting imminent process collapse. This assessment implies that without decisive American action, the window for salvaging the agreement may close rapidly.
Qatar and Egypt, the other principal guarantors, echoed concerns about implementation challenges while emphasizing their commitment to forcing progress on the second phase. Qatari Premier Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani acknowledged the critical nature of the current moment, recognizing that transformation from temporary ceasefire to lasting peace requires overcoming substantial obstacles.
The call for US intervention highlights a fundamental tension in the peace process: mediators can facilitate agreements but lack enforcement mechanisms compelling compliance. Only parties with significant leverage over the combatants can ensure implementation. The appeal to American leadership reflects pragmatic recognition that diplomatic success requires matching negotiation achievements with practical pressure ensuring adherence to negotiated terms.