Liberal Democrat MP Bobby Dean has delivered a stinging critique of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s handling of the car finance scandal, calling her intervention “unprecedented and disgraceful.” Dean, a member of the influential Treasury committee, argues that Reeves’s actions, which included an attempt to influence the Supreme Court, send a clear signal that the government prioritizes the financial industry over the interests of consumers.
Reeves’s controversial move involved urging Supreme Court judges to limit compensation for borrowers, a measure that was ultimately rejected. Although the Supreme Court’s final ruling largely favored lenders, sparing them a potential £44 billion compensation bill, Dean’s condemnation is focused on the Chancellor’s perceived bias. He claims the government is “too keen to demonstrate it is on the side of business,” and this approach undermines the fundamental principle of consumer protection.
The Chancellor’s actions were a direct response to intense lobbying from the car loan industry and City leaders. The Financing and Leasing Association (FLA) had warned the Treasury that a massive compensation payout could threaten the stability of some lenders and restrict credit availability for consumers. These concerns were compounded by warnings that the legal uncertainty was making the UK less attractive to international investors.
Despite these industry concerns, Dean believes the government’s intervention sets a dangerous precedent. He argues that if the potential for industry damage is used to justify blocking consumer redress, it could be used to undermine almost every consumer protection case. He stresses that strong consumer protection is essential for a healthy economy, as it fosters the public confidence required for people to borrow and invest, knowing they are protected against corporate misconduct.
29